Why Google Analytics Has Not Killed Adobe Analytics (…Yet)
Adobe Summit is here (and yes, Treasure Data has a booth). It’s arguably the biggest conference focused on digital marketers and Adobe Marketing Cloud customers with 14,000+ expected attendees.
Adobe Marketing Cloud consists of 8 products, many of which were acquisitions over the last decade.
Probably the most famous of the eight is Adobe Analytics. Formerly called SiteCatalyst, it was the flagship web analytics product by Omniture, which Adobe acquired in 2009 for $1.8B.
If you happen to be outside of the Adobe/Omniture ecosystem, you might ask, “How is it different from Google Analytics? Doesn’t everyone use Google Analytics? How come Google Analytics hasn’t killed Adobe Analytics?”
The answer is one word: enterprise. I will use data to show why this is the case.
Let’s look at some data. I used Treasure Data to query our account data in Salesforce and put them into 3 categories:
- Adobe Analytics users
- Google Analytics users
- Use at least one of them
With Salesforce data in Treasure Data, you can write a simple SQL query like this one:
to produce a table like this:
Now we are ready for slice-and-dicing. Our sample size is N=39741 and you can see the breakdown by industry and company size at the end of the post.
Google Analytics has 7x more users, but Adobe Analytics sells to bigger companies
One big difference is the size of the install base. For all company sizes, Google Analytics had a larger install base than Adobe Analytics.
The disparity in the install bases is expected. Unlike Google Analytics, which is mostly used as a free product, Adobe Analytics is a 100% paid product. Note how there was zero Adobe Analytics customer with <10 employees in our database.
The normalized picture tells a consistent story:
It’s not like small companies do a lot of analytics
Adobe Analytics’s staying power comes one unmistakable fact: bigger companies have bigger appetite and more money to spend on analytics. You can see this by calculating the percentage of companies with either Google Analytics or Adobe Analytics by company size:
As you can see, even accounting for sample size, it’s fair to say that bigger companies are more likely to use at least some kind of analytics, and the beauty of selling to bigger companies is that they have the budget to pay for critical initiatives like analytics. Sure, Google Analytics is free, but if you have a multi-million dollar analytics budget every year, ROI matters more than price. If your analysts are all trained on Adobe Analytics and their insights impact decisions worth millions of dollars (such as deciding on which marketing channel to double down), I predict it will continue to do just fine even when there’s a free alternative like Google Analytics.
Google Analytics and its ecosystem = more to come
So, where does that leave us with Google Analytics? A “less advanced” marketing analytics tool? A free alternative without upward enterprise mobility?
The answer is neither because Google already monetizes Google Analytics plenty. It’s called AdWords.
(The diagram courtesy to Rachel Stephens’s analysis of Alphabet’s revenue)
As you can see, close to 90% of their revenue is based on Search and Advertising. Google Analytics’s native integration with AdWords and DoubleClick, the two main Google Advertising platforms, means that Google Analytics gives more insights about advertising spend than Adobe Analytics within the Google ecosystem, which deepens the user’s engagement within Google’s ecosystem (That said, typical of Google, not all of its products are connected. For example, YouTube has its own analytics but doesn’t integrate directly with Google Analytics).
In short, Google Analytics can be a loss leader for Google to funnel more business into their core advertising business.
Of course, Adobe is not going to sit back and do nothing. I am curious about what they will be unveiling at Adobe Summit tomorrow, and I’d love to discuss with you all where the future of marketing analytics is headed (We’ll be at Booth 447!)